What Does the Word Viking Mean?
Our usual concept of "vikings" is incorrect.
Norsemen would go viking. Viking was an activity, not a people. Our concept of the work
viking would be like using "fishing" to refer to people who fish.
Just
because the Americanised noun "viking" is derived from a verb does
not mean that the United States of North American form is absolutely “incorrect." It simply means that the
Americans have “invented” a noun "viking" that derived from what was
a verb in another language. Nowadays, modern, real, English does not generally use
"viking" as a verb either.
The figure of the Viking has been banging around the Western world since
at least the National-Romantic period, as an embodiment of the rough-n-tough
piratical marauder (how romantic!) and of the primitive, “authentic” origins of
the Nation State, being appropriated by various Germanic, north and otherwise,
countries (how nationalistic!). In
Sweden they had the “Gothic Society” (Det Götiska Förbundet), which reacted
against the neoclassical aesthetic of the literati with an emphasis on the “Viking
heritage”. Members published poetry
which made use of Old Norse literature and Scandinavian Folklore (both seen as
repositories of “authentic” Scandinavian ethnic and cultural identity), and
when they got together they wore horned helmets (the peoples of actual vikings
did not have horns on their helmets, by the way– they drank mead (an alcoholic honey
beverage drunk by those viking– as well as everyone else from ancient Egypt to
the North) out of horns.
Some Vikings in the sagas are described as reprehensible men: evil-doers
and trouble-makers of the worst kind. Many "bad guys" in the stories
are introduced "Hann var víkingr mikill" (he was a powerful Viking),
including Þórólfr bægifótr, who was not only a great troublemaker while he
lived, but also after his death. For years, his ghost tormented and killed the
people of the district. In some early Christian works, contemporaneous with the
sagas, the word víkingr is used to mean murderer or plunderer.
The Old Icelandic Homily Book, which dates from the early part of the 13th
century, paraphrases one of the parables told by Jesus, using the word víkingr:
En þá er konunginum var sagt, hvað þeir höfðu gjört, þá sendi hann her
sinn og lét drepa víkinga þá og brenndi upp borgir þeirra.
And when the king was told what they had done, he sent his army and
ordered them to kill the vikings and burn their city.
|
Later, the word lost the sense of adventurer and came to mean only the
worst kind of evil-doers. Indeed, the word was scarcely used at all in the
later medieval and Renaissance periods.
The word came back in to wide circulation during the Romantic era in
the 19th century, when the study of Viking-age history became fashionable.
Artists painted romantic pictures of Viking-age tales. Many ordinary people
fancied themselves as latter-day Vikings, decorating their homes in the
"Viking" style and dressing in "Viking" clothing.
More serious scholarship in the 20th century suggested that these
northern adventurers were not the depraved killers, looters, and rapists
depicted in popular stories and tales. And so, for many people, and
especially for many English-speaking people, the word Viking was fully rehabilitated.
Yet, for some people of the world today, the word Viking retains all of the
ugly connotations of casual murder and wanton destruction and horrific
brutality.
I don't mean to downplay the fact that some Norse people committed these
atrocities in the age of Vikings. But it's worth noting that many other
Europeans were also raiding at this time in history, and, like the Norse,
were taking advantage of the changes occurring in the European political and
mercantile scenes at this time.
|
Viking-age documents from other cultures suggest that some Europeans
would rather be raided by Norsemen than by some of the other raiders active
during this period. The Norse tended to be less interested in sacking towns or
in destroying buildings or in mass killings. They were more interested in
grabbing the valuables and moving on, and so, for example, they didn't destroy
the vineyards at Aquitaine, the way that Frankish raiders did.
Although the Norse did their share to disrupt Europe's coasts and inland
waterways, they probably behaved no worse, and possibly some better, than other
European raiders of the time.~~ Al (Alex-Alexander) D Girvan.
Comments
Post a Comment